Snark: to annoy or irritate

"Snark" has been in English language dictionaries since at least 1906, and Lewis Carroll used the word to describe a mythological animal in his poem, The Hunting of the Snark (1874). Most recently, the word has come to characterize snappish, sarcastic, or mean-spirited comments or actions directed at those who annoy or irritate us.

At first, this blog was just going be a place to gripe, but because it's more satisfying to take action than it is to merely complain, now most of the posts/reposts suggest ways to get involved in solving problems.


Friday, June 11, 2010

Help Mississippi's Women

Feminist Majority Foundation - Equality around the world


Two weeks ago, an anti-abortion extremist invaded the wait-
ing room of the Jackson Women's Health Organization in 
Jackson, Mississippi. Law enforcement authorities were not 
only slow to respond when called, but once on site, chose 
only to talk with the aggressor instead of filing a police 
report. This is the only abortion provider in the entire state of 
Mississippi. Extremists are trying to shut down this vital women's 
clinic. This clinic and its doctors need our help now.
Thankfully, many of you have responded to our requests for 
help for this clinic, with your support we has just funded an 
improvement to the clinic's security system that will help 
prevent future invasions. But we must do more.Two weeks 
ago, an anti-abortion extremist invaded the waiting room of 
the Jackson Women's Health Organization in Jackson, 
Mississippi. Law enforcement authorities were not only 
slow to respond when called, but once on site, chose only 
to talk with the aggressor instead of filing a police report.
This is the only abortion provider in the entire state of 
Mississippi. Extremists are trying to shut down this vital 
women's clinic. 
This clinic and its doctors need our help now.
Just one year ago, Dr. George Tiller was brutally murdered. 
His killer, Scott Roeder, has been sentenced to life in prison, 
but the extremists have not been deterred.
The leading anti-abortion extremist in Jackson is an advocate 
of Justifiable Homicide - or the belief that justifies the murder 
of doctors who perform abortions. The clinic and its doctors 
have been repeatedly threatened.
The clinic needs immediate help to pursue legal 
strategies and to make additional enhancements to its 
security system.
Our National Clinic 
Access Project 
legal coordinator 
has traveled to 
Jackson to assist 
the clinic. She met 
with clinic staff 
and community 
pro-choice 
supporters to 
discuss 
ways to improve security, to assess legal needs and to 
devise new ways for the local community to support this 
critically needed health facility. We are determined to do 
everything we can to keep Jackson Women's Health 
Organization open and its patients, doctors and staff safe.
Help the doctors, health care workers, and patients of 
Jackson Women's Health Organization today by making 
an emergency, tax-deductible contribution. Half your 
contribution will go directly to the clinic to help pay for 
upgraded and additional enhanced security measures.
The other half of your emergency contribution will help 
support our National Clinic Access Project's work to keep 
this clinic and other besieged clinics across the country 
safe and open. The demand for our work is dramatically 
increasing.
As I write this, we are also working with Dr. Carhart and 
his clinic in Nebraska. Dr. Carhart, who had worked with 
Dr. Tiller, and his clinic were immediately targeted for closing 
by Wichita-based Operation Rescue after the murder of Dr. 
Tiller. This group had harrassed Dr. Tiller for seven years.
And we are also working very closely with Family 
Reproductive Health in Charlotte, NC under siege by 
Operation Save America/Operation Rescue. Recently, 
anti-abortion extremists published the photographs of and 
information about the clinic's doctors in a WANTED poster. 
Similar posters appeared before the brutal murders of two 
doctors in Pensacola, Florida.
Without doctors and clinics to provide safe, legal abortions 
and access to birth control, there can be no choice for women.
Please make an emergency contribution today to help 
Jackson Women's Health Organization and our National 
Clinic Access Project.
Together we are making a difference.
For Women's Lives,
Kathy Spillar
Eleanor Smeal
President
Kathy Spillar
Katherine Spillar
Executive Vice President

P.S. Act now to ensure the safety of the courageous doctors 
and staff as well as women seeking health services at the 
Jackson Women's Health Organization.
 1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 801, Arlington, VA, 22209 
703.522.2214 | webmaster@feminist.org

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Pay Gap is a Man's Issue, Too

AAUW Action Network
The Pay Gap is a Man's Issue, Too
On this day in 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed the Equal 
Pay Act into law, giving women the promise of equal pay for equal 
work.  And yet today, 47 years later, woman still get paid only 77 
cents on average for every dollar a man makes; women of color 
still face an even wider pay gap; and we're still fighting for pay 
equity. 

The wage gap is obviously a problem for women, but what's not 
often talked about is that it's also a problem for men.  Women now 
comprise 50 percent of the paid workforce for the first time in 
history, and two-thirds of mothers are either the primary or co-
breadwinners for their families.  The wages women earn have 
never been more important to individual families or the overall 
American economy.

The wage gap may hit women directly, but it clearly affects men 
as well.  Over the course of a year, the gender pay gap results in 
the average woman earning $10,622 less than she should be 
taking home.  How important is that money to the husband who 
was laid off and is still depending on his wife to get the family 
through his period of unemployment?  How significant is that 
money to the son who starts college in the fall and is counting 
on his mother to help him shoulder the enormous cost of tuition?  
How different would the economy look if women were actually 
receiving that money every year?  Did you know that men of 
color face a pay gap, too, when compared to white men?

That's why, as we mark the anniversary of the Equal Pay 
Act and anticipate Father's Day just around the corner, 
we're asking you to get the men in your life involved in 
our efforts to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act as well.  
Forward this alert to all the men you know and ask them to urge 
their senators to quickly move and pass this critical legislation.  
Then, consider giving Dad the gift of AAUW membership for 
Father's Day.  After all, it literally pays dividends.

Women need the updated protections and tools the Paycheck 
Fairness Act can provide, and so do men.  The bill passed the 
House well over a year ago with strong bipartisan support, and 
new polling data just released by the Paycheck Fairness 
Act Coalition, of which AAUW is a key leader, shows that 
84 percent of voters support a new law like the Paycheck 
Fairness Act.  But the Senate has been sitting on it for far too 
long. 

Take Action!
In honor of the Equal Pay Act anniversary today, urge your 
senators to move the Paycheck Fairness Act by clicking on 
the "Take Action!" link in the upper right corner or copying and 
pasting the following URL into your internet browser.  Then, 
with Father's Day approaching, forward this email or use the 
"Tell a Friend" option to urge all the men in your life to take 
action as well.
Learn more about the Paycheck Fairness Act, and see what 
to your site or blog and a Twibbon to your avatar, and share
your thoughts about how pay equity affects men on AAUW 
Dialog, Facebook, and Twitter.  You can also visit AAUW's 
Kit and Pay Equity Program in a Box for ideas, tips, and
resources to use in your community throughout the year.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

74 Democrats Sold Out to AT&T, Verizon, & Comcast




Infuriatingly, they signed an industry-backed letter telling the 
FCC to abandon efforts to protect Internet users by prohibiting 
big companies from blocking Internet traffic.
Not only is this letter an attack on net neutrality, but by signing 
the industry letter, these Democratic members of Congress 
are attempting to drastically undercut the FCC's ability to make 
a fast, affordable and open Internet available to everyone in 
America — they are actually taking a position against the 
interests of rural and low-income communities. This is 
unacceptable.
We need to make sure they know that their constituents 
and other consumers are paying attention and will hold 
them accountable when they undermine net neutrality 
protections.
What this comes down to is a principle known as "net 
neutrality." Net neutrality means that Internet users, not 
Internet service providers, should be in control. It ensures 
that Internet service providers can't speed up, slow down, 
or block Web content based on its source, ownership, or 
destination.
Of course broadband providers are insisting that we should 
just trust them and there's no need for consumers to be 
protected by net neutrality rules. But we cannot trust AT&T, 
Verizon or Comcast to protect a free and open Internet any 
more than we could trust BP to protect the oceans.
Without strong net neutrality rules, we might have to rely upon 
the good will of large telecoms to protect our access to the 
diversity of political perspectives. We might have to trust 
companies like Comcast, which actively and secretly 
interfered with users' ability to access popular video, photo 
and music sharing applications. We might have to trust 
companies like AT&T, which censored anti-Bush 
comments made by Pearl Jam's lead singer during a concert.
A free and open Internet is an important part of 21st Century 
democracy, but these members of Congress signed a letter 
that undercut the efforts of the FCC to make sure the 
Internet stays free and open.
In other words, they decided to stand with wealthy 
corporations rather than stand up for your interests.

The simple fact of the matter is that powerful companies 
with a vested interest in this fight like AT&T have 
armies of lobbyists to push their agenda.
If these 74 Democrats are going to get the message that 
it's unacceptable for them to sell out American consumers, 
it's only going to be because people like you speak up.
Thank you for standing up for a free and open Internet.
Matt Lockshin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets




Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Consider a Credit Union


I've been a satisfied credit union member for over 30 years, and I couldn't agree more with the letter (below) from Democracy for America's Political Director. Many people don't know that money in credit unions can be protected just as well as money in banks. Most credit unions don't charges fees for membership, either. Call your local credit union and ask a few questions. You may be pleasantly surprised at the answers you get.
--Cheryl

From Democracy for America:

The big banks on Wall Street -- JP Morgan/Chase, Citibank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley -- have had an incredible year, getting huge taxpayer bail-outs, making record profits and paying out multi-million dollar bonuses to their CEOs while many of them are still participating in all the highly leveraged activities that caused our housing and credit crisis in the first place.

I'd like to say the good news is that Congress is poised to pass major financial reforms later this month, so the President can sign the bill before the 4th of July. The problem is the bill they're planning to pass isn't good enough. Don't take it from me. Here's what the New York Times said about it last week:
The financial reform legislation making its way through Congress has Wall Street executives privately relieved that the bill does not do more to fundamentally change how the industry does business.

Despite the outcry from lobbyists and warnings from conservative Republicans that the legislation will choke economic growth, bankers and many analysts think that the bill approved by the Senate last week will reduce Wall Street's profits but leave its size and power largely intact.
In other words, too big to fail banks will still be too big to fail. It's time to take matters into our own hands. So today we're joining the Move Your Money campaign started by the good people at The Huffington Post. Declare your independence from big banks and pledge to Move Your Money to a local community bank or credit union today.

Community banks and credit unions don't act like the big banks. Typically, they're more responsible in how they manage their money, they're more closely connected to the people and businesses who live near them, and they're more inclined to make loans they know will get paid back. And your local credit union isn't going to ask Congress for a multi-billion dollar bail-out either. These are the qualities most people want banks to have.

The idea is simple. To regular Americans this issue isn't Left or Right -- it just makes sense. If enough people move their money from a big bank to a smaller, more local, more traditional community bank, we can break up the big banks ourselves. By working together, we won't have to wait for Congress make change happen.

Click here to
TAKE THE PLEDGE AND FIND A CREDIT UNION OR COMMUNITY BANK NEAR YOU

We can send a message to Congress, the President and every candidate running for office that we don't trust big banks with our money. But it's up to us to do it.  Let's get started right now. Thank you for everything you do.

-Charles Chamberlain, Political Director
Democracy for America