Snark: to annoy or irritate

"Snark" has been in English language dictionaries since at least 1906, and Lewis Carroll used the word to describe a mythological animal in his poem, The Hunting of the Snark (1874). Most recently, the word has come to characterize snappish, sarcastic, or mean-spirited comments or actions directed at those who annoy or irritate us.

At first, this blog was just going be a place to gripe, but because it's more satisfying to take action than it is to merely complain, now most of the posts/reposts suggest ways to get involved in solving problems.


Saturday, June 5, 2010

74 Democrats Sold Out to AT&T, Verizon, & Comcast




Infuriatingly, they signed an industry-backed letter telling the 
FCC to abandon efforts to protect Internet users by prohibiting 
big companies from blocking Internet traffic.
Not only is this letter an attack on net neutrality, but by signing 
the industry letter, these Democratic members of Congress 
are attempting to drastically undercut the FCC's ability to make 
a fast, affordable and open Internet available to everyone in 
America — they are actually taking a position against the 
interests of rural and low-income communities. This is 
unacceptable.
We need to make sure they know that their constituents 
and other consumers are paying attention and will hold 
them accountable when they undermine net neutrality 
protections.
What this comes down to is a principle known as "net 
neutrality." Net neutrality means that Internet users, not 
Internet service providers, should be in control. It ensures 
that Internet service providers can't speed up, slow down, 
or block Web content based on its source, ownership, or 
destination.
Of course broadband providers are insisting that we should 
just trust them and there's no need for consumers to be 
protected by net neutrality rules. But we cannot trust AT&T, 
Verizon or Comcast to protect a free and open Internet any 
more than we could trust BP to protect the oceans.
Without strong net neutrality rules, we might have to rely upon 
the good will of large telecoms to protect our access to the 
diversity of political perspectives. We might have to trust 
companies like Comcast, which actively and secretly 
interfered with users' ability to access popular video, photo 
and music sharing applications. We might have to trust 
companies like AT&T, which censored anti-Bush 
comments made by Pearl Jam's lead singer during a concert.
A free and open Internet is an important part of 21st Century 
democracy, but these members of Congress signed a letter 
that undercut the efforts of the FCC to make sure the 
Internet stays free and open.
In other words, they decided to stand with wealthy 
corporations rather than stand up for your interests.

The simple fact of the matter is that powerful companies 
with a vested interest in this fight like AT&T have 
armies of lobbyists to push their agenda.
If these 74 Democrats are going to get the message that 
it's unacceptable for them to sell out American consumers, 
it's only going to be because people like you speak up.
Thank you for standing up for a free and open Internet.
Matt Lockshin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.