Snark: to annoy or irritate

"Snark" has been in English language dictionaries since at least 1906, and Lewis Carroll used the word to describe a mythological animal in his poem, The Hunting of the Snark (1874). Most recently, the word has come to characterize snappish, sarcastic, or mean-spirited comments or actions directed at those who annoy or irritate us.

At first, this blog was just going be a place to gripe, but because it's more satisfying to take action than it is to merely complain, now most of the posts/reposts suggest ways to get involved in solving problems.


Thursday, October 21, 2010

Embarrassed for Them

These women are embarrassing me! Naturally, I want to see more women in positions of political responsibility, but how are we ever going to be taken seriously with displays of ignorance such as these? 
The post below comes from the PFAW website, but a longer video of the debate may be found at:
O'Donnell
http://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk-elections/article/christine-odonnell-first-amendment-question-floors-audience-video/19680390


When Sarah Palin took to the airwaves to spread her dangerously flawed understanding of freedom of speech, tens of thousands of activists joined PFAW in sending her copies of the First Amendment to help her get it. Now it seems that her protege, Christine O'Donnell -- the GOP candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware -- needs help understanding the separation of church and state.

In a debate with her Democratic opponent Chris Coons (at a law school of all places), she challenged him to tell her where church-state separation was in the Constitution, and seemed absolutely baffled when he informed her that it was right there, clear as day, in the First Amendment. Even the audience gasped -- and laughed -- in shock.

Clearly, O'Donnell needs to read the First Amendment again.

Sign our petition now and we'll send Christine O'Donnell a copy of the First Amendment on your behalf!

Our goal is to send tens of thousands... or even hundreds of thousands of copies of the First Amendment to Chirstine O'Donnell. If she reads it over and over again, maybe the words will sink in and she'll finally start to get the concept of separation of church and state.

It was remarkable... Christine O'Donnell was chiding Chris Coons about his knowledge of the Constitution as she defended her assertion that "evolution is a myth" and her support for allowing the teaching of creationism in public schools. Coons rightly felt she needed to be reminded about the constitutional foundations for the principle of separation of church and state, at which point her extremism... or stunning lack of knowledge... or both became evident.

Christine O'Donnell's denialism extending from evolution to one of the bedrock constitutional principles on which our country was founded -- the separation of church and state -- is unacceptable.
-- Ben Betz, Online Communications Manager
P.S. You can hear her in her own words and then add your name to the petition here >



Dear Ms. O'Donnell,
As a candidate for U.S. Senate, you should display at least a basic knowledge of our Constitution and its First Amendment, which reads:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
petition button

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.